Nation, loud and clear: WE'RE VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS TO STOP TRUMP Democrats: Thank you so much for electing us on a platform of civility, unity and bipartisanship
-
-
what is the possible justification for ignoring the overall, national results and outcome, and focusing solely on a few specific races that one deems "high-profile"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you’re forgetting that those “high profile” races were so much in the news because they were such longshots. Taking over the house is not less important because it was expected.
-
also, there's a reason they were predicted to take back the house. and it wasn't because of some great national craving for bipartisan cooperation with the trump admin
-
Depends what you call a longshot. Every Texas House candidate on the Dem 'flip' list lost. Seems like Dems are walking back what 'flip' means now. Was it a race or wasn't it?
-
Re: House, the opposition party always gets a bump in the mid-terms. This was all safely within the expected. To me at least, that much was baseline.
-
let's revisit this convo once we have the turnout figures
-
We have them: the Dems depended on turnout to win. If you're counting turnout when you've lost the vote, it's like counting rushing yards vs. points in football. Nice, but who cares? Or like obsessing over the popular vote in a presidential election...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

