"Whatever its faults, middle-class nationalism provided a common ground, common standards, a common frame of reference, without which society dissolves into nothing more than contending factions, as the Founding Fathers of America understood so well—a war of all against all."
-
-
If I were teaching this book to (say) Millennials or GenZ'ers now, I'd probably have to assign reading that somehow conveyed what the US was like before it was split into localist/globalist, mass-market/elitist, Flyover/Bicoastal halves.
Show this thread -
That, in fact, there *was* something other than our current, post-Reagan neoliberal reality at some point. To me it's poignant, as I'm old enough to remember hints of the world before (particularly given my very bourgeois Goldwater Republican parents)...
Show this thread -
...and then discovering what the world had really become when I entered the wider world, a nation of smug elites masquerading as meritocrats that had given up any notion of a Jeffersonian democracy. It was quite the shock. Not least of all, because I was decidedly *not* an elite.
Show this thread -
Oh, and since people will likely freak out at the positive use of 'nationalism', note that Lasch was writing in 1995, where that hadn't yet come to represent a completely negative thing ('jingoism' was more the word then). This is another big change between now and then.
Show this thread -
By 'nationalism' he meant a sense of common and unifying identity and purpose (even in the midst of the always pluralistic and motley American polity), not necessarily the overweening rah-rah jingoism of our Trumpian present, and all that darkly suggests for the future.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

