National security journos, such as @davidwroe and many others, must not take govt PR as fact over drone killingshttp://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/29/australians-were-killed-by-a-us-drone-strike-and-we-deserve-to-know-why …
-
-
@antloewenstein And : Does the government have any concern that this ... constitutes the extrajudicial killing of two Australian citizens? -
@davidwroe It's your job to speak to people beyond Canberra PR, like find sources in Yemen to add detail, nuance, questions etc -
@antloewenstein That's twice you've told me what my job is. Point is, it's yours too, so go do it instead of complaining. -
@davidwroe You're national security correspondent, which doesn't mean simply repeating govt talking points on drones etc. pretty clear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@antloewenstein Such as: Does the Australian government intend to raise any concerns about this matter with the United States? -
@davidwroe That's just the beginning. Your article, like many others, adds few caveats, uses language given by govt, calls dead "militants" -
@antloewenstein@davidwroe facts are so pre-9/11
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.