Putting education aside, I'm confused as to why a working class person wouldn't want to pay a less amount of money for the same exact service. How they could let the word "tax" get in the way of that is beyond me.
Are you really confused why a working class person has no desire to be taxed for the health insurance and student loan debt of single, childless, underdeveloped people who spend their days terrorizing society with their woke luxury beliefs?
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Support for social programs is driven by pragmatism (costs less overall), or compassion. Pushback is almost universally based on who will benefit (but you often have to ask questions to get that to come out). I'm not judging; all 3 perspectives are valid and need reconcilliation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is a strawman you've constructed. If college were free or had no debt then students could choose to go into any subject, including maths, sciences, etc, not just "oppression studies".
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are no dem politicians who want to increase costs for the working class for these things. They want to increase costs/taxes on people who are extremely wealthy, but lower them for working class. The belief otherwise is just a smear used against them by lying politicians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This one is a gem.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.