How is this not the worst of all worlds.https://next.redhat.com/2018/11/14/ukl-a-unikernel-based-on-linux/ …
-
-
-
Replying to @kubernetesonarm
Many of the advantages of unikernels are simplicity, efficiency, and safety. Starting with a code base that is none of these, and then attempting to achieve it while maintaining compatibility seems infeasible. I think they fail to understand why unikernel adoption struggles.
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ibuildthecloud @kubernetesonarm
I challenge their core assertion, "The fundamental problem is that today’s unikernels ... have abandoned the evolutionary community process that has made Linux such a success." Show me your data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Based on my experience in OSS over the last 4 years, I'd guess OSS unikernel projects probably struggle for the same reasons that other OSS projects do. Lack of marketing budget or giant corporate interest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"evolutionary community process..." WTF are they talking about? Did they just suggest unikernels are not OSS? MirageOS is a Linux
@linuxfoundation project.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Please don’t assume bad intention. Just bad wording. They probably mean: no well-maintained unikernel framework for existing POSIX apps exist, and that is AFAIK true. (Because these are half-baked unikernels anyway.)
Disclaimer: I work for RH and also work with #MirageOS a lot.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.