Not that amount of inventory loss 

this hurts ppl at the bottom, are you slow???
-
-
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
...absolutely this amount of inventory loss lol, this is petty shoplifting, not a natural disaster
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
That amount "isnt petty", NO ONE can afford if this happens often, which it DOES, BOOM!https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2021-05-26-walgreens-closes-17-stores-in-san-francisco-because-of-rampant-theft/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
Lol anything is possible if you lie. The spike in crime is super recent, not since 2014, almost as if there was a major economic collapse and pandemic.
Not to mention the plan to close stores preceded the spike by several years.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
You didn’t read the article did you? Stop trying to act as if stealing over 100 items is the same as stealing 1 item, you should learn basic math some time
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
They basically are. You’re viewing this as a pleb, you gotta step into the shoes of what this looks like as “loss” for a multibillion dollar corporation. Do you think WG’s pays $12 for shampoo bottles??
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
You think everything is centralized
do you know how double entry accounting works? They do separate accounting for each location, no corporation subsidizes their stores. Typical liberal, doesn’t understand shit about economics or corporate accounting1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
Not a liberal.
And yes, plenty of corporations subsidize their stores - WG owns about 15% outright - but that’s besides the point.
They have insurance for this. They lose 0 dollars.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
Insurance doesn’t cover irregular events, and you don’t care about raising the prices of insurance premiums of other customers cuz of constant petty theft. You’re a lefty when you believe in “voodoo economics”, theft is bad, even 4 year olds know this
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
This isn’t a discussion on the morals of theft, though. Theft just is. It will always happen, forever. If your business doesn’t take theft into account as the cost of doing business, you’re going to lose a lot of money.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
And no one accounts for that much to be stolen....
-
-
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
Accounts for what? In an instance like this, insurance covers it. And yes, they REALLY do. They anticipate X dollars worth of shoplifting the way that restaurants anticipate X dollars worth of dine and dashing.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.