Simply wrong. Moldbug from his very first blogged words propounds his system as a technically superior engineering solution to commonly accepted problems, compared with the Modern Structure. You are speaking a foreign language.
-
-
Replying to @Vaderness @Outsideness
I would absolutely claim that law is upstream of morality, but that is hardly the point. The fact that a key feature of the Modern Structure is contrary to a consistent reading of the nominal law is interesting and significant from an engineering standpoint.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Notably, you cannot prevent a thing from happening by passing a law against it if there is already a law against it but it is happening anyway. That is an engineering principle, and the precise reason for bringing the legal question up at that point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's like the observation that you can't free space on a Unix filesystem by removing a file, if there is a running process that has an open file handle on the file. Possibly you would read that as a moral condemnation of file handles, but it really isn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I shouldn't snark so much though. Apologies. If I were to read Derrida I would probably understand him about as badly as you understand Moldbug.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.