The worst piece of peer review I got was a double blind reviewer who told me that I totally misrepresented the past work of Donna Yates (me) and needed to cite her (me) more.https://twitter.com/timeshighered/status/989733632167235586 …
Well I'm a bit surprised a reviewer familiar with the work of X wouldn't recognise the paper they were reviewing as being by X. A non-conversational style might be what preserves that anonymity?