Of course, humans are exactly the minimum intelligence necessary to make high civilization. It's impossible to get smarter than this without disrupting the dynamics that made humans this smart in the first place.
-
-
Seems we are disrupting those dynamics and making humans dumber now as a result. Perhaps Fermi's paradox is explained.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
That's pretty close to my position that intelligence when it reaches a certain level (our level, in fact) necessarily becomes self-sabotaging.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @HalifaxShadow and
Science, as we now understand it, has only existed for a handful of generations. It’s only relatively recently — an evolutionary eye-blink — that we’ve understood the extent to which the human being himself can be made the subject of empirical study and practical improvement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @UDeplorableIV @anomalyuk and
The first cult, political or religious movement of sufficient size (say, 70,000) whose members give full-throated endorsement to scientifically grounded eugenic principles could easily come to dominate the species in relatively short order — provided they held together.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @UDeplorableIV @anomalyuk and
You could raise the average IQ of a population by ~15pts per generation if you sterilized 99% of the men, 50% of the women, and knocked up the remaining women with 4 kids sired by the top 1% of men. Draconian? Sure. But, people have done worse — and to significantly less gain.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @UDeplorableIV @HalifaxShadow and
Well my hypothesis is that beings that intelligent can't be managed, motivated or organised. As you say, careful selection could certainly increase IQ significantly. But natural selection has not done so, maybe because 120+ IQ is not adaptive.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @HalifaxShadow and
Perhaps we can find new ways to motivate them?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UDeplorableIV @HalifaxShadow and
The engineering problem is how to get beings dumb enough to follow some goal consistently to be able to direct beings smart enough to do unimaginable new things. a.k.a "The AI Alignment Problem"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @HalifaxShadow and
I don’t think that’s a problem. In the military, in my civilian job, and in academia there’s no shortage of smart, capable, people who respond to normal incentives and normal forms of social control. There’s simply no will to disrupt existing power structures for long term gains.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Well one possible engineering solution is to embed a small proportion of highly intelligent individuals in a larger population with a "safe" intelligence level. That also accounts for your other point about distribution of benefits.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.