Exactly. "Disageeing with the consensus" does not remotely imply "rejecting the hypothesis of anthropgenic global warming"
-
-
That's the bait and switch they always play, to make their alarmist projections seem much more widely accepted than they actually are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Further, note that "rejecting a hypothesis" is a technical term; it means that four papers claim (within the limits of their experiments' accuracy) to have *proved* that humans are not causing warming. Frankly, I'm surprised it's that many.
4:06 AM - 1 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.