Exactly. "Disageeing with the consensus" does not remotely imply "rejecting the hypothesis of anthropgenic global warming"
That's the bait and switch they always play, to make their alarmist projections seem much more widely accepted than they actually are.
-
-
Further, note that "rejecting a hypothesis" is a technical term; it means that four papers claim (within the limits of their experiments' accuracy) to have *proved* that humans are not causing warming. Frankly, I'm surprised it's that many.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.