That's the bait and switch they always play, to make their alarmist projections seem much more widely accepted than they actually are.
Exactly. "Disageeing with the consensus" does not remotely imply "rejecting the hypothesis of anthropgenic global warming"
-
-
-
Further, note that "rejecting a hypothesis" is a technical term; it means that four papers claim (within the limits of their experiments' accuracy) to have *proved* that humans are not causing warming. Frankly, I'm surprised it's that many.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.