It kind of does. Brits decided to surrender their health to the government and now are mad about having government medicine.
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
The ruling would have been the same if there was no government healthcare in Britain. Why does nobody understand this?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @Alrenous
Private healthcare is very common in Britain. The judge that ruled that keeping Charlie Gard alive would be child abuse probably uses it.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
Private healthcare doesn't go in front a judge in the first place, because they don't have to beg anyone to let them keep doing it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Alrenous
Yes they do. That is what the case was about. If the government says it's in the interest of your child to die, you have to beg.
4:12 AM - 1 Aug 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.