e.g., 2040 historians will be able to point at 2016-17 journals and say, "by 2017, there was serious doubt in the literature about AGW."
-
-
-
But the perception of that situation today is, "a few more cranks are getting contrarian politically-motivated papers out", nothing to see.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly. IQ/genetics/climate all have lively research ongoing. It's the cathedral consensus factory operating on top that obscures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.