High-low versus the middle is so pervasive, and so explanatory, it is astounding. We have a genuine law of social organisation.
-
-
Replying to @Neoabsolutism
The only response it gets is "muh magic spontaneous order." This is pathetic.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism
Isn't a "genuine law of social organisation" the same as a spontaneous order? I know you talk about this, but I haven't grasped your point
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
God no. Spon order is a shitty concept that falls apart when people are forced to clarify.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism
"laws of social organisation" is a shitty concept that falls apart etc.. Or maybe not. Either way, I literally cannot see the distinction.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Neoabsolutism
Any claim that spontaneous order is either inevitable or automatically desirable is wrong - really obviously wrong and stupid
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @Neoabsolutism
I guess that's the bailey, and I don't want it. Even when I was a libertarian I didn't think that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Th fundamental libertarian error is to assume away the context and conditions necessary for the existence of the spontaneous order they want
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.