It would be better if innovation was not disruptive. Patents all but guarantee innovation will disrupt.
you mean if incumbents are free to use all innovations, disruption is reduced? Never thought of that. Minor, I suspect.
-
-
real disruption is not "company X replaces company Y", it's "organisational form X replaces form Y".
-
even though company Y can use X's innovation, it isn't able to effectively because it is not organised the right way.
-
It is organized to exploit patents rather than to flexible in organization Even today some firms are flexible, just not many.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.