That's the official report into how the Civil Service is supposed to work
there are a few threads now to this discussion. This is the one I care about (your legal claims are no doubt correct).
-
-
The "separation of powers" historically never meant between politicians and civil servants.
-
Executive, Legislature and Judiciary were the traditional three branches. Crown/Prime Minister & Civil Service not separate
-
The idea of a Civil Service with independent *power* gradually arose in the late 20th Century.
-
Because our executive and legislature are one. It's to give effect to a modified separation of powers.
-
It arose around the same time in the USA, where legislature and executive are separate.
-
I tend to assume it's part of the general managerial revolution, along with the "post-war consensus" in politics.
-
but I'm interested in alternative theories. The idea that it is *more* democratic to do things this way is new to me.
-
Independent power? I was talking about impartiality.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.