I've seen others dislike that metaphor but the one @wcsoto offers is by far the best reason to abjure the metaphor
-
-
longstanding discussion. Objections not without merit but I disagree. http://anomalyuk.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/cathedrals-and-cultural-dominance.html …
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @wcsoto
There are a few glaring errors in this essay
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
while not an error per se I dont think the specific cathedral analogy is necessary for any NRx ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
it isnt necessary for that collaboration to be a religious analogy
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fides_et_cancri @wcsoto
if progressivism is not a religion then the best approach is to join it and correct it from within.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
its religious character is the central fact of neoreaction.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes: but Jackal's point is that neoreaction is a failed project. I'm not sure I disagree (or agree).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PorphyCoon @anomalyuk
But I think part of
@fides_et_cancri's point is NRx accepts many if not most of the premises from which Progism emerged@wcsoto5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I dont really care that much at the end of the day. A dead tree deserves no curses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
if Christian Reaction and NRx are irreconcilable, then arguing with each other is a very low priority.
-
-
Replying to @anomalyuk @wcsoto
I am not with "Christian Reaction" nor any of the Rx offshooots and do not claim to speak for any variant
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.