I've seen others dislike that metaphor but the one @wcsoto offers is by far the best reason to abjure the metaphor
-
-
longstanding discussion. Objections not without merit but I disagree. http://anomalyuk.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/cathedrals-and-cultural-dominance.html …
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @wcsoto
There are a few glaring errors in this essay
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
while not an error per se I dont think the specific cathedral analogy is necessary for any NRx ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
it isnt necessary for that collaboration to be a religious analogy
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fides_et_cancri @wcsoto
if progressivism is not a religion then the best approach is to join it and correct it from within.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
its religious character is the central fact of neoreaction.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes: but Jackal's point is that neoreaction is a failed project. I'm not sure I disagree (or agree).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
that's not something usefully expressed as a quibble over "offensive" terminology.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if you want to say "NRx is totally wrong from the very beginning", that's fine.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
that's why I like the Cathedral metaphor so much, it exposes fundamental disagreements about reality.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.