THANK THE LORD JESUS CHRIST that someone else has an issue with the cathedral metaphor
-
-
There are a few glaring errors in this essay
-
while not an error per se I dont think the specific cathedral analogy is necessary for any NRx ideas.
-
it isnt necessary for that collaboration to be a religious analogy
-
if progressivism is not a religion then the best approach is to join it and correct it from within.
-
its religious character is the central fact of neoreaction.
-
Yes: but Jackal's point is that neoreaction is a failed project. I'm not sure I disagree (or agree).
-
But I think part of
@fides_et_cancri's point is NRx accepts many if not most of the premises from which Progism emerged@wcsoto -
of course it does. That is why I called it "neoreaction". http://anomalyuk.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/secular-reaction.html …
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes; I read that too around the time posted, and also a good argument from that PoV.
-
and as for the Mike Argument - I for one won't exchange for his term, because it's not the same point.
-
Where you're off tho is it's not about "encountering the fact that other religions exist" (ORLY!)
-
not that they exist but that they are dominant. No Christian cathedral can be built in today's West.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Neoreactionary Theory"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.