Yes, I think that's right. If it can be done, then I would be proven wrong. But right now, I doubt it can be done.
-
-
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
I think a possible side effect of emphasizing smart contracts would be to find ways of doing without contract at all.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
that's the point of neocameralism: a "share" is neither a contract nor a title, it is a physical possession.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @BestNewsAgency
But the fact that there is title in property shows that possession is insufficient to establish a right to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A right to property involves both possession and evidence of having come by possession in a regular way.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Analogously, it is not sufficient for a sovcorp that the investors have possession of the state.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They must have come by possession in a regularized way. In other words, the possession must be legitimate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
even the experts in the technologies don't yet have a full grasp of the implications (hence the Etherium comedy)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk @BestNewsAgency
True. On the other hand, some consequences of relying on automation are clear: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
well that's automation with a manual override. Automation without override is a different beast entirely.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
anomalyuk Retweeted anomalyuk
risks not well understood, but obviously huge. DAO thread:https://twitter.com/anomalyuk/status/743734461414551552 …
anomalyuk added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.