On a shortcoming of neocameral terminologyhttp://tonreihe.tumblr.com/post/153616158905/on-a-shortcoming-of-neocameral-terminology …
-
-
Replying to @BestNewsAgency
Yes, I think that's right. If it can be done, then I would be proven wrong. But right now, I doubt it can be done.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
I think a possible side effect of emphasizing smart contracts would be to find ways of doing without contract at all.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @tonreihe @BestNewsAgency
that's the point of neocameralism: a "share" is neither a contract nor a title, it is a physical possession.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @BestNewsAgency
But the fact that there is title in property shows that possession is insufficient to establish a right to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A right to property involves both possession and evidence of having come by possession in a regular way.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Analogously, it is not sufficient for a sovcorp that the investors have possession of the state.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
they have possession of the keys that mechanically control key aspects of the state's powers
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.