@LucianGeorge1 Yes, but from credible, published climate scientists (in this case), not Piers Corbyn or Christopher Booker!
No, that's the same one again. That 31 million is over 16 years. Friends of the Earth US gets over 10 million/yr
-
-
how many
$s on altruistic ends would one have to spend to counter 1 $ spent on appealing to selfish ones? -
Good question. People are very suspicious of arguments from interest. My guess, 5c
-
I mean the appeal to selfishness in an individual.. the appeal to the easy route. In a general context
-
Ah yes, different point. But mine remains; there is a general acceptance of the claims
@medialens is making -
so people see scepticism as originating from oil.
-
partly because they really did fund some very dishonest propaganda right at the beginning (1990ish?)
-
I can't comment on the gross dishonesty of (either) side, over the years, But, worry this is being lumped
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and that 31M went to various orgs that have little if anything to do with climate. Bogus story from Gdn.
-
I did mention that: "pursuing many conservative goals"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.