"Responsible journalism in consultation with government stakeholders"
-
-
yes, normies never notice the important stuff
-
but I meant it as an example of a deep state action in plain sight that was noticed and aroused suspicion, but...
-
...which suspicions failed to be taken seriously. Actually, I wonder if creating backdoored standards like that...
-
...is really meant as cover and support for agents of influence elsewhere - "Here, use this, it's in the standard!"
-
consider its occurence in https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/376.pdf
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and that Thiel and Assange are both part of that, with real power challenging inside? Or is that another bad guess?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.