pointing liberalism was an elite ideology doesn't fare very well if you're an anti liberal aristocrat.
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
what,
@RichardBSpencer is an aristocrat? (Rushes off to check Burke's)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
don't know if he is (if he isn't, "right" just got a weird meaning)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @RichardBSpencer
I feel confused. Are you really saying that you have to be an aristocrat to be in favour of aristocracy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
no. is there a name for a defender of aristocracy that is not "aristocrat"? because I meant the latter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
"aristocratist"? or Monarchist. But it makes your initial crticism of
@RichardBSpencer very much weaker.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
...but I think liberalism is rather ubiquitous among elites (whilst masses are rather conservative)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
the problem is two confusing senses of "elitism". I believe elite class should rule. The current elite class professes not to
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk
given the option, would you rather have the current elites governing, or leave it as is?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
If the same people ruled openly in a secure structure, that would be good. Their incentives are the root of the problem.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
"If we win, the people who rule will probably be the same, but with a better political formula" https://anomalyuk.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/the-neoreactionary-programme.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.