In American Revolution, only 2-3% of population actively fought against Great Britain. Only 10% identified with cause.
-
-
Replying to @RichardBSpencer
pointing liberalism was an elite ideology doesn't fare very well if you're an anti liberal aristocrat.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
what,
@RichardBSpencer is an aristocrat? (Rushes off to check Burke's)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
don't know if he is (if he isn't, "right" just got a weird meaning)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @RichardBSpencer
I feel confused. Are you really saying that you have to be an aristocrat to be in favour of aristocracy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
no. is there a name for a defender of aristocracy that is not "aristocrat"? because I meant the latter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
"aristocratist"? or Monarchist. But it makes your initial crticism of
@RichardBSpencer very much weaker.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
it would indeed be suspect for an aristocrat to complain liberalism is an elite project. Not for a commoner.
-
-
Replying to @anomalyuk @RichardBSpencer
indeed. but a commoner that wishes for aristocracy is under serious trouble, if the aristocrats aren't willing
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.