The *next* post will incorporate this totally valid point:https://twitter.com/cyborg_nomade/status/772976274570641408 …
-
-
-
looking forward to it
-
By the way, are you familiar with
@NickSzabo4's writings? e.g. http://unenumerated.blogspot.co.uk/2006/06/jurisdiction-as-property-paper.html … -
still to get started in those. thanks for the link =]
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
of course, trying to concentrate power is merely self interest. but at some point, no one will sell it anymore
-
The point about formalism/neocam is to divide the *benefits* of power without dividing power, hence not merely self interest.
-
it's the self interest of power, I guess (to remain centralized, hence secure)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this post is interesting, in which it adapts formalism as a tool for centralization. this is more realistic indeed.
-
that's precisely how Moldbug defined formalism from the beginning: exhange power for shares. …http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2007/04/formalist-manifesto-originally-posted.html …
-
sounds reasonable. will have to read the Manifesto and go back to Land's quibbles with him
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
will wait next post, to see how you deal when this centralization is impossible, i.e. when the real constitution is formalized
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.