remove the faces, and you see the underlying processes that actually run things
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
this alone is already enough to show that the whole "sovereignty conserves" stuff is mostly either misguided or misused
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
it's not possible, ever, to have *a man* making decisions on his own, unchecked by anyone or anything else. there's no individual will.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
constitutionalism is merely recognition of this reality. power is an idea, and ideas are primordially checked by their effects
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
think of this as "the fundamental problem of loyalty". neocameralism replaces the old trust demanding kingdom w/ the trustless corporation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
corporations work well b/c stockholders check management and both are checked by consumers who are then check by management.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
I think that is untrue unless you become extremely specific about what you mean by "check" in each case.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
different groups have well-defined and practically separable "powers", not some diffuse "balancing" influence.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.