Because reasons, you see. If you don't instantly agree it's because you're not a progressive.https://twitter.com/soncharm/status/697410869077024769 …
-
-
Replying to @PorphyCoon
@PorphyConob it's even more fundamental tho, article doesn't bother to explain the mechanism by which they'd 'face closure'. maybe I'm dumb
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PorphyCoon
@PorphyConob haha (because it's so difficult!). but even if I pretend to buy that, what's stopping UK from importing Indians? it doesn't say
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PorphyCoon
@soncharm If you keep up this questionable behavior on Twitter I'ma report you to the Sarkeesian Council & they'll Trust &Safety you, Kulak!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PorphyCoon
@PorphyConob heh. but srsly, piece just says it's 'because of the UK’s inability to have its own immigration policy'. What's that even mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PorphyCoon
@PorphyConob just feel like I'm missing something v. basic. Devil's advocate here: couldn't they literally just open their doors to India?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@PorphyConob @soncharm the argument the Express is making is: we want to limit the number of immigrants, but have to let in all Poles etc...
-
-
Replying to @anomalyuk
@PorphyConob
@soncharm ... therefore the only way to restrict total numbers is to keep out non-EU members like Indian curry chefs.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk Well that's insane for the reason@soncharm is suggesting. Though he's not saying it's insane.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.