@JamieJBartlett who told you blockchains were cheap? Bitcoin leger is abou 2 dvd's of data & cost of storage is threatening to tear it apart
-
-
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk I didn't say on the bitcoin blockchain? .1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk And? I'm thinking a specific block chain for Parliamentary records.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamieJBartlett
@JamieJBartlett please, look at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_(software) … and also http://github.com technical people already store everything this way2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk Yes I know this obviously. What's your point?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamieJBartlett
@JamieJBartlett I'm trying to pin down what you mean by blockchain. BTC style blockchain with peer broadcasts is not cheap.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@JamieJBartlett OTOH if you mean "they should put up a git repo of Hansard" you should say so because it's much clearer. And a good idea.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk I meant create a new block chain for parliamenary records. But your suggestion also good, and with same ultimate purpose!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamieJBartlett
@JamieJBartlett glad we agree, but to labour the point, I think it's the same thing. The distributed tamperproof storage of git is what...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@JamieJBartlett ...was combined with p2p networks and proof-of-work to create blockchains. So it's your idea not mine, I'm just clarifying
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.