Extraordinary piece of photographic detective work that may exonerate Prince Andrew http://gotnews.com/breaking-can-conclusively-prove-princeandrew-underaged-prostitute-photo-fake/ …
-
-
Replying to @Heresy_Corner
@Heresy_Corner on the face of it that explanation doesn't make any sense. Unlikely that pixel size of original would be visible like that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@Heresy_Corner artifacts from distinct original images could be preserved in a collage, but not in the way it says.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk And yet there does appear to be a discrepancy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Heresy_Corner
@Heresy_Corner the size of a pixel is one pixel-that's the only way to measure it. The square blobs in the article are enlarged separately2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk That's the point, surely? Blown up to the same size, they have differently sized pixels. How come.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Heresy_Corner
@Heresy_Corner who says they are blown up to the same size? The size of the pixels is the only way to tell.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk If two images have different resolutions, and they are blown up the same ratio, one will appear to have larger pixels.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Heresy_Corner
@Heresy_Corner until you combine them into one image, at which point anti-aliasing will blur that all out and leave you with a new resolutn2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@Heresy_Corner every image processing package does that anti-aliasing as standard. There is only one pixel size in any image, however fake.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Heresy_Corner wouldn't surprise me in the least if it were fake. I hope it is. But the article is either totally confused, or bullshit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.