@SamoBurja What would be the formalist response to this problem?
-
-
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand@SamoBurja Organ harvesting?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk@SamoBurja I thought formalism was just not lying about who has power.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand@SamoBurja If a human has the right to be kept alive, that is a power of a sort—a liability on the state’s balance sheet1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk@SamoBurja Do we need to posit a 'right' here or can we just keep them alive out of the goodness of our hearts?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand@SamoBurja Or for other reasons (Moldbug scrabbles a bit), but any reason creates the liability. …http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/dire-problem-and-virtual-option.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk@SamoBurja OK but is it always and everywhere unformalist to not maximise state profits?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand To@SamoBurja's original point: Moldbug’s attempt to put support for the indigent on a formalist foundation is non-trivial1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anomalyuk
@anomalyuk@SamoBurja Wait, is the question whether formalism *demands* said support or whether it *allows* it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand@SamoBurja I think both are in question. MM argues for the demand, but is not at his most convincing.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@AvengingRedHand @SamoBurja I would like to just pretend his arguments are convincing, but is that hypocrisy? Or is it a basic human need?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.