Excessively direct virologist. PI @VIDOInterVac. Affiliate @georgetown_ghss. Virus-host dramatics. 1X Jeopardy! loser. 
in 
. Rep: @anniescranton. she/her
Du kannst deine Tweets vom Web aus und über Drittapplikationen mit einem Standort versehen, wie z.B. deiner Stadt oder deinem genauen Standort. Du hast jederzeit die Möglichkeit, Standortangaben nachträglich zu löschen. Mehr erfahren
But that is the issue. "The risk" is extremely vague. The portions of the cable that Rogin quoted don't demonstrate a clear and specific risk other than "hey, we're concerned about bat SARS-like CoVs that use ACE2 as a receptor"
Here's Rogin's piece. There are a number of inaccuracies about how the "cable" is presented: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/ …
"During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory," From what I can tell this refers to the BSL4 lab.
Again you are speculating and the using your speculation to draw (wrong) conclusions. I’m no scientist but this seems intellectually lazy and biased.
This is a lie. There are zero inaccuracies about how the cable was presented. That’s why nobody involved with the cable is objecting. You can take issue with the cable itself. But to say I presented it badly is just fiction. You owe me an apology.
I would love to see the cable in its entirety. Will you publish it?
What I (and I think @angie_rasmussen as well, though she can speak for herself) take issue with is the strong implication in the framing of the article that if the market wasn't the source, the lab likely was.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
