Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschakThe key figure here is harrowing. For p<0.05, the false positive rate is always >33% if prior odds are 1:10!Quote TweetBrian Nosek@BrianNosek · Jul 22, 2017New Nature Human Behavior paper: 72 of us make the case to redefine statistical significance from .05 to .005. http://osf.io/mky9j4:00 PM · Jul 22, 2017·Twitter Web Client6 Retweets18 Likes
Joachim@cocoafrog·Jul 23, 2017Replying to @andy_matuschakLooks interesting, but can you explain (or link to) what “prior odds” are? So far I don't understand the chart.1
Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschak·Jul 23, 2017Our initial estimate for Pr(H1)/Pr(H0), based on our own beliefs, scientific consensus, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_probability…1