Spectacles v Glass:
Flippant,silly v serious,refined
Larkish v pricy,committed
Occasional v always
My eyes PoV v film PoV
Focused v unsure
👍
Conversation
Replying to
Underlying all that of course:
I see clear user empathy and understanding on the one hand, and technocentrism on the other.
Replying to
I still don’t think it’s a sustainable thing, but at least Snapchat’s product has a sense of purpose.
1
Replying to
relevant:
Quote Tweet
RE: Snap Spectacles, this thread (scroll up) captures their potential. If they take off, so much opportunity would open up. twitter.com/artypapers/sta
Replying to
it still doesn't solve the problem that people are made uncomfortable when they know a camera is pointed at them
1
Replying to
especially if there's no obvious gesture to tell if it's active (like someone holding up a cell phone)
2
Replying to
like there's two separate problems here, whether Glass was a useful product, and how cameras make others around you feel
1