Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschak👏 for this clever microworld on fluid systematicity. Was skeptical, then the essay addressed exactly my objections.Quote TweetDavid Chapman@Meaningness · Jul 25, 2016‽ “A first lesson in meta-rationality”: in a STEM curriculum for cognitive 4→5 transition. http://meaningness.com/metablog/bongard-meta-rationality…3:30 PM · Jul 25, 2016·Twitter for Mac5 Retweets1 Quote Tweet14 Likes
Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschak·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @andy_matuschak(Incidentally, http://meaningness.com/metablog/stem-fluidity-bridge… by the same author has unsteadied my epistemological grounding, and I have not yet righted myself.)211
soroush@khanlou·Jul 25, 2016i think https://meaningness.wordpress.com/2015/10/12/developing-ethical-social-and-cognitive-competence/… is his best work. it takes a few reads, but the best things always do3
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @andy_matuschakThank you! I’m curious: was that the Church-Turing objection, or something else?1
Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschak·Jul 25, 2016Church-Turing as part of "isn't this still 4?" and then "I don't see how to ramp this past 4.1"1
soroush@khanlou·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @adamache seamlessly convinces gop brass and energizes the party base with populist anger, id say he understands the fluidity of systems
soroush@khanlou·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @bryanjclark and @andy_matuschakfor sure, that was a huge revelation for me as well
Jonah@Zalambar·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @andy_matuschakextremely skeptical of this model when it seems to exist to justify STEM primacy as path to salvation.1
Andy Matuschak@andy_matuschak·Jul 25, 2016I don’t think it does; I think it observes that people often reach rationality through STEM, expresses a longing for other paths.1