Gold in the footnotes on ’s “Is Anything Worth Maximizing?” talk transcript: medium.com/@edelwax/is-an
Conversation
Replying to
well i suppose I should fix the typos in that passage then
1
1
heheheh too bad screenshots-as-text on Twitter are by-value rather than by-reference
7
Replying to
I came to edtech with exactly this flawed view (w/o realizing)—grateful to , , , & more who helped me see. Trying…
2
1
11
Still feel blind most of the time, frankly.
1
9
Show replies
Replying to
I guess I read this "that" as the restrictive "that", i.e. "the subset of psych theories which paint…"
1
1
Precisely. Bryan, I'm complaining about popular psych, evo psych, neurononsense, etc kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections
1
2
Show replies
Replying to
If they're bullshit, they're not "theories." sorry personal quest
apropos, from carl zimmer
nytimes.com/2016/04/09/sci
1
the pop science press (, ) is the criminal here, always tryna lend the aura of Theory to rando "theories"
1