Can someone refresh my memory on the challenges which associated types avoid (by comparison to type-parameterized protocols)?
Conversation
Replying to
Closest thing I found in my archive of Devforums mail: devforums.apple.com/message/104539
1
2
I see, yes. Associated types are less general (therefore simpler to implement / optimize?)
1
Show replies
Replying to
1
4
5
This makes sense! As I understand: that wouldn't *preclude* future support of non-one-to-one relationships, right?
1
Show replies