RT functional [ppl]: if I explain a monad as "an object which stores a value which can only be accessed via a callback" am I full of sh
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Conversation
A little bit, though that does explain some kinds. But e.g. the list monad describes nondeterminism; ((-> r) is a monad.
1
Replying to
I think the easiest way is to think of it as a kind of composition and to think about the types of return and bind.
Replying to
1
2
I think we need a new social network. it'll be like twitter but for explaining monads to each other
1
3
Show replies