convolve ["fish", "face"], append -> [ ff, ia, sc, he ]
Conversation
Replying to
Hey, “convolve” *is* a better name than zipWith. Nice.
Replying to
Of course, I just realized that my reducers aren’t iterable, i.e. you cannot convolve a map lazily (yet) *sigh*
Replying to
But if this works out, reducers are 1:1 with signals given a reducible which observes a property and calls the block on KVO.
1
Replying to
I wonder if “entwine”, “interleave”, or “weave” might be even better, as more common words.
3
Show replies
Replying to
(but making reducers iterable is annoying cos of impedance mismatch; filter/mapcat are a pain in -nextObject API flow)