There was some discussion about the merits of -subscribe: vs. more “action-y” terminology here: github.com/ReactiveCocoa/
Conversation
Good discussion. I think e.g. startWithNextAction:e:c: might actually be 10x better (in terms of ease-for-Joe-Cocoa).
1
I’m no Cocoa Pro, but startWithNextAction implies it’s like running a background task, no?
1
Replying to
@paulcbetts With signals cold by default, that’s basically what’s happening. Needs to say “Side! Effects! Here!”
@paulcbetts Also “startNext:” -> “startWithNextAction:” is just Cocoa idiomatic naming, but ya’ll can do what you want. ;)
1
Show replies