There was some discussion about the merits of -subscribe: vs. more “action-y” terminology here: github.com/ReactiveCocoa/
Conversation
Replying to
Good discussion. I think e.g. startWithNextAction:e:c: might actually be 10x better (in terms of ease-for-Joe-Cocoa).
Replying to
I’m no Cocoa Pro, but startWithNextAction implies it’s like running a background task, no?
1
@paulcbetts With signals cold by default, that’s basically what’s happening. Needs to say “Side! Effects! Here!”
1
2
Show replies