Conversation

In retrospect, one of the most striking elements of a "walking conference" format is that it's a routinized way to incite 20-50 hours of long conversation with someone you don't (yet) know well. That's a very unusual social move!
Quote Tweet
👋 from the Cotswolds, a place of outrageous fantasy. At a sort of “walking conference”. An outstanding format worth spreading: hike 5-15mi/day—trails encourages long 1:1 chat—then facilitate whole-group sessions over dinner. (See amazing @chrismichel & @craigmod for more 📷) twitter.com/chrismichel/st…
3
5
75
(Of course, a normal conference could achieve this, too, but the constraint of walking enforces a small group size and conversation over presentation)
2
7
Just by comparison, my normal venue for long conversation is walks around SF, or dinners. That's ordinarily 1-4 hours, avg ~2. So getting 50 hours of contact time takes ~20 events. (And of course there's catch-up overhead…)
1
3
But a weekly event with a new contact is rare. Even meeting monthly is pretty rare. Getting 20 walks/dinners often takes me years! Occasionally there'll be day-long trips, etc, but those are exceptions.
1
5
This is of course part of the classic argument for coliving. But ideally you want good methods for rapidly spending a lot of time with new people who seem interesting, in addition to spending many hundreds of hours with housemates.
1
7
It feels pretty weird to have a couple chats with someone, then invite them on a week-long vacation together. Most people only take a few weeks of vacation a year; it's a big, vulnerable ask. But it's somehow much less intense to invite them to a week-long *conference*.
1
1
12
(Reminds me a bit of certain types of (non-silent!) meditation retreats, where you're stuck on a mountain with a group of strangers, trying to navigate new inner ground and knowledge together. Everything is accelerated.)