Why is it concerning?
Conversation
I'm sad we lack that kind of academic community, but I just always assumed it's because we have a norm of caring most about shipping impactful work. (i.e. where you started in the thread)
2
1
A charitable take would be that it reflects the incommensurability of the work: cultural accretion isn't a priority because every project is unique. But more realistically, I think it often reflects a mix of unseriousness, anti-intellectualism, and cynicism.
1
3
Consider: game designers are arguably much scrappier than software designers; they certainly prize shipping. They produce cultural knowledge at a much higher rate.
1
3
I guess I'm not sold that seriousness and intellectualism will result in a better field. Agreed on cynicism though. Would there really be growth proportional to organization overhead of cultivating journals, conferences, etc. ?
1
I was always jealous of Architects' seriousness though because it seemed more fun and meaningful, so I'd be happy if we could adopt that kind of culture / practice.
1
I also wonder what game designers would say if we asked them what they think of app designers / developers. Do we just have rose tinted glasses about this? For example, the people at apple and google take their work tremendously seriously and publish/patent work regularly
1
I've asked this of many game designers; I've never gotten an admiring response.
You don't necessarily need journals and conferences. Game designers' blogs and Twitter feeds are better too.
1
3
And of course I know many Apple/Google designers. They take their work seriously, but (usually) not their field.
They don't write the patents; lawyers come chat with them and ghostwrite them. And I can think of almost none who publish on their own.
1
3
I feel inspired to write something good to my blog now and share earnestly on twitter
1
3