Conversation

File system GUIs ostensibly mimics files in folders, but funny to note that *reordering* is a fundamental verb for physical papers in folders (or in piles on my desk). There’s no way to reorder a list of files in Finder without something silly like adding numbers to the front.
14
16
167
You can switch to grid view and drag icons around, but that’s a “reposition” verb, not a “reorder” verb, so doing something like “moving a paper to the top of the pile” is surprisingly awkward. (Of course, explicit positions are sometimes useful too!)
1
1
26
Replying to
This rant came from wondering: why do I feel like I want a special piece of software to manage my reading lists, or my sheet music? Why not just folders of PDFs? (Never mind the fact that most specialized “read it later” software doesn’t let you reorder the queue!)
5
2
52
Related:
Quote Tweet
i fear and resent scrolling (e.g. scrolling way up to see chat history) b/c i know application developers don't take it seriously as app state like I'll click on another chat, then back to the chat where I'd scrolled way up, and the app'll have thrown away my scroll position
Show this thread
8
27
File under: everything is trapped in little black rectangles
Quote Tweet
Replying to @andy_matuschak
This is a very good point but sidesteps the reason why paper shuffling works so well: you can easily scan each piece of paper. Sure, Explorer & Finder have "quick view" functionality but it can't hold a candle to the information density & ease of scanning of physical paper.
1
13
Replying to
Well you could store the file entries in that order. It used to be expensive to do that (had to rewrite entire dir when file was reordered) but it's probably cheap today in all but the biggest folders.
1