Conversation

Analysis of memory in learning is often framed in terms of probabilities, e.g. the chance you'll recall something on a test, which might decline over time. This does describe the data, but it's funny how alien this is to how memory feels. It does not *feel* like a binomial draw!
7
7
66
I often feel like I can "almost" remember something (but then can't), or like I "easily" remember something. Experimentally, these judgments do map to recall probabilities, but is it actually a stochastic process?
8
1
27
Replying to
Because mental states will naturally vary as you move about and think different thoughts, this naturally gives rise to a memory behavior you can describe with probabilities, but it's not like your brain is rolling dice. The "randomness" comes from behavior & the environment.
1
12
(Encoding variability theory is also a nice potential mechanistic explanation for the spacing effect: when cramming you re-encode an item several times with the ~same mental state; when spacing, you encode it against different mental states, thus more chance for future overlap)
1
18
I guess this is not unique to models of memory. For instance, language models often work by estimating the probability that the next word is "banana" or whatever. It's not like prose is stochastic, but probability is a useful way to capture co-occurrence.
1
7
Yeah sometimes things I thought I forgot pop up in hypnagogic state right B4 sleep. Or on a run. Actually, I think I have more thoughts/second while running than in any other activity. Too bad most of those focus on " ugh do I still have 30 min of running left? Unreal..."