Conversation

This question's gauche, but: given the prevalence of $400k++ comp packages for ~30-year-olds in Big Tech, why aren't there lots more "gentle[wo]man scholars"? i.e. people quitting to do non-remunerative creative projects I can think of some, but shouldn't there be thousands?
207
110
1,059
Right! The thing isโ€ฆ that doesn't seem to make this all that impossible? We have a nice condo in SF; our mortgage is ~$3k/mo. But an annuity which would pay that mortgage would only cost ~$600k; one could readily set aside triple that in a few years as a senior engโ€ฆ
8
1
8
Wouldnโ€™t it take ~9 years if you set aside all of your take home pay? Assuming net 50% total tax burden, and triple 600k is 1.8M So even if you set aside half of your take home, itโ€™s 18 years, right?
3
7
Replying to and
More like seven or eight, I think, with a fairly aggressive lifestyle and 8% returns on the savings I describe here.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @Duderichy and @steveloh722
This is a good point. Maybe I'm being too optimistic. Let's seeโ€ฆ lots of great group houses in SF for $1,500/mo. Say we cut discretionary to $2,500/mo. That's $182k/yr leftover. You'd need ~$1.2M annuity to maintain that lifestyle; that'd take ~6 years.
NFT profile picture
I can imagine a lot of people not wanting to be in their 30s living in shared housing in the Bay Area. The better play if you wanted to do something like this would be to get a remote job that pays 85%-90% of that salary working from a lower cost of living area.
1
1
Can confirm. Considering stock and bonuses, I probably make half what I would in SV. But I have a nice house I could easily pay off tomorrow, acres of forest, a creek, and I work out of my daylight basement. 20 minutes to restaurants, theaters, and an international airport.
3