4
20
122
Conversation
Oh, gosh, wow, this is a truly excellent representation. Did you make this? ❤️
1
3
I did, thank you! Anything you’d change?
2
3
Replying to
For me, the "synthesis" and "antithesis" schemes are spot-on, but the "metarational contextuality" scheme feels off in its final two "layers". It may just be my understanding/interpretation of that scheme—I see it as interested in arguments, but skeptical of their totality.
"Uses beliefs for their consequences" isn't the conclusion I draw from layers 1-4. For me, it's something like "uses beliefs as lenses when they are reasonable", but still wanting to collect those lenses/args as useful tools, wanting to understand scope of their applicability.
1
2
Makes sense! That area went under the most revision for sure, and I went with a personal take on it
1