Conversation

There’s also methods in which, instead of dropping awareness of the breath, you intensify it for its own sake (“pranayama”). That’s usually considered an advanced/tantric practice currently.
1
So regarding the second half of your question, yes, there are many people for whom the “head toward no-self/emptiness as fast as possible” approach doesn’t work well, and for whom something with more form (such as mantras or visualizations) works better.
1
In many traditional systems, you did practices with form (e.g. visualization) for years before being introduced to the formless practices (with bare attention to breath being a preliminary to the latter).
1
1
Going directly to formless practice is a modern (early 20th century) innovation that dramatically accelerates the process for people who can do it, but doesn’t work for everyone.
1
I am not a teacher, so I can only speculate… Definitely trying different things seems sensible. But I’d say a day is not nearly enough to test.
2
So trying a hundred things is not feasible. Perhaps 5-10. But they aren’t isolated methods; they are parts of systems, and have structure and function. Ask: “Is this method supposed to do something I want?”
2
I guess when I asked the original Q you probably thought: "Jose's Q is a Q that assumes a premise (the goal of the practice) which he didn't ask for but he should have so here it is the question that I should have asked" (Which is actually correct)
1
Ah, no idea about "best." Vipassana and metta were extremely helpful for me in many ways, but not for piti/sukha. Also found that "dry" vipassana didn't work at all for me; had to try again once I had developed better concentration, then got some insight.
1
1
Show replies