In 1907, William James complains that psychologists have ignored the topic of "the energies of men"—that is, the practical stamina available for "running one's mental and moral operations".
Have good frameworks emerged for this in the past century?
jstor.org/stable/2177575
Conversation
There's "cognitive load", "ego depletion", "self-efficacy", etc… none of these really seem to hit the nail on the head here.
2
17
"Everyone is familiar with the phenomenon of feeling more or less alive on different days. Everyone knows on any given day that there are energies slumbering in him which the incitements of that day do not call forth, but which he might display if these were greater."
This was a very interesting overview of work attempting to characterize "mental effort". This article doesn't attempt to explain day-by-day variation, but I may find something like that in the cite tree…
Quote Tweet
Replying to @andy_matuschak
perhaps doesn't hit the nail on the head either (if you're focused on 'energy'), but there are recent lines of work on resource-constrained mental effort and motivation. maybe easiest to trace branches from here? annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114 (non-paywalled: wouterkool.com/papers/Shenhav)
7
Replying to
not sure it’s as universal as he says. i’ve known a lot of people who were basically the same every day for years. no i don’t get it either.
1
Replying to
the passage makes me feel great sadness and yearning, because it feels like in the century since it was written, institutions (eg school, work) have veered far in a direction where there's few affordances for fluctuations in one's stoke.
2
2
It's not a "sprint" if you're expected to do it every week.
1